CVE-2026-48508

描述

## Summary `StrictRolePermission` and `AuthorityCreatorPermission` in `lemur/auth/permissions.py` call `flask_principal.Permission.__init__()` with zero `Need`s when their config flags are unset. Both flags defaulted to `False` in code prior to the fix, so this was the state of any Lemur install that hadn't explicitly opted in. Flask-Principal's `Permission.allows()` returns `True` whenever `self.needs` is empty. The `.can()` gate therefore passes for every authenticated identity, including the lowest-privilege role Lemur ships (`read-only`). A user holding only `read-only` can create root Certificate Authorities, create and edit notifications (an SSRF sink), create domain entries, and upload arbitrary certificates. These classes are the sole authorization check on those endpoints. ## Root Cause ```python # lemur/auth/permissions.py class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission): def __init__(self): requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", False) if requires_admin: super().__init__(RoleNeed("admin")) else: super().__init__() # empty Need set class StrictRolePermission(Permission): def __init__(self): strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", False) if strict_role_enforcement: needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleNeed("operator")] super().__init__(*needs) else: super().__init__() # empty Need set ``` `flask_principal.Permission.allows()` (upstream, v0.4.0): ```python def allows(self, identity): if self.needs and not self.needs.intersection(identity.provides): return False ... return True ``` When `self.needs == set()`, the first guard is falsy and is skipped. `excludes` is also empty, so `allows()` returns `True` for any identity. `AuthenticatedResource` (the parent class for these views) sets `method_decorators = [login_required]`, which checks authentication only, no role. So the permission `.can()` is the only authorization layer in front of these endpoints. ## Affected Endpoints Views whose only authorization check is `StrictRolePermission().can()` or `AuthorityCreatorPermission().can()`: | Method | Path | Source | |----------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------| | POST | /api/1/authorities | lemur/authorities/views.py:231 | | POST | /api/1/certificates/upload | lemur/certificates/views.py:651 | | POST | /api/1/pending_certificates/\<id>/upload | lemur/pending_certificates/views.py:545 | | POST | /api/1/notifications | lemur/notifications/views.py:227 | | PUT/DEL | /api/1/notifications/\<id> | lemur/notifications/views.py:370,384 | | POST | /api/1/domains | lemur/domains/views.py:131 | `POST /api/1/authorities` is gated by `AuthorityCreatorPermission().can() and StrictRolePermission().can()`; both have empty Needs by default. The other rows are gated by `StrictRolePermission().can()` alone. Note on scope: `PUT /api/1/authorities/<id>` also references `StrictRolePermission`, but its gate is `AuthorityPermission(...).can() and StrictRolePermission().can()`. `AuthorityPermission` is constructed with non-empty Needs (`RoleNeed("admin")` plus authority-scoped needs), so that endpoint is not bypassable by a `read-only` user and is excluded from this report. ## Impact A user holding only the `read-only` role can: 1. Create root Certificate Authorities. CA cert and private key are persisted in Lemur's DB with the attacker as owner. Any internal trust store that pins Lemur-managed roots can now be signed against by the attacker. 2. Upload arbitrary certificates via `/certificates/upload`, including attacker-supplied keys with destinations such as AWS push. 3. Create or modify notifications, which reach an SSRF sink (see related finding F3, Slack notification webhook). 4. Mark arbitrary domains as `sensitive`, manipulating Lemur's domain registry and the cert-issuance approval path. Combined with any low-privilege credential leak (phished employee, leaked SSO token) or insider access, this is a pivot from "any authenticated identity" to control of the PKI issuance plane. ## Remediation The config flag defaults for `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION` and `LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT` were changed from `False` to `True`. Restrictive role enforcement is now active on all default installs without requiring explicit configuration. ```python class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission): def __init__(self): requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", True) ... class StrictRolePermission(Permission): def __init__(self): strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", True) ... ``` **Note:** The opt-out branches (empty Needs) remain in the code. Operators who explicitly set `ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION = False` or `LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT = False` in their config will reintroduce the bypass. These flags should be left unset or set to `True`.